Category Archives: Franchise (HRS 241)

For financial institutions

HB 1522

SUBJECT:  INCOME, FRANCHISE, INSURANCE PREMIUM, Diversified Farming Business Investment Tax Credit

BILL NUMBER:  HB 1522

INTRODUCED BY:  MCKELVEY, MORIKAWA, SAN BUENAVENTURA, TODD, WARD

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:  Enacts a new income tax credit to encourage investment in sustainable agriculture.  A direct appropriation would be preferable as it would provide some accountability for the taxpayer funds being utilized to support this effort.  Meaning, we as taxpayers know what we’re getting and we know how much we’re paying for it.

Continue reading HB 1522

HB 1216

SUBJECT:  INCOME, FRANCHISE, Low-Income Housing Investment Tax Credit

BILL NUMBER:  HB 1216

INTRODUCED BY:  CHOY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:  Enacts a new income tax credit to encourage investment in low-income housing projects.  A direct appropriation would be preferable as it would provide some accountability for the taxpayer funds being utilized to support this effort.  Meaning, we as taxpayers know what we’re getting and we know how much we’re paying for it.

Continue reading HB 1216

HB 1527, HD-1

SUBJECT:  INCOME, GENERAL EXCISE, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, FRANCHISE, LIQUOR, Periodic Review of Exemptions and Credits

BILL NUMBER:  HB 1527, HD-1

INTRODUCED BY:  House Committee on Finance

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:  This bill would require the Department of Taxation to periodically review exemptions and credits now provided under various tax chapters.  This type of review, however, should already be within the purview of the Tax Review Commission that is provided for in our constitution and is supposed to be appointed this year (given that it wasn’t appointed last year when it was supposed to happen).

Continue reading HB 1527, HD-1

HB 1527

SUBJECT:  INCOME, GENERAL EXCISE, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, FRANCHISE, LIQUOR, Periodic Review of Exemptions and Credits

BILL NUMBER:  HB 1527

INTRODUCED BY:  LOWEN, BROWER, ICHIYAMA, ING, JORDAN, KEOHOKALOLE, KOBAYASHI, C. LEE, LOPRESTI, LUKE, MORIKAWA, NAKASHIMA, NISHIMOTO, OHNO, ONISHI, SAIKI, YAMANE, YAMASHITA, Johanson, McKelvey

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:  This bill would require the Department of Taxation to periodically review exemptions and credits now provided under various tax chapters.  This type of review, however, should already be within the purview of the Tax Review Commission that is provided for in our constitution and is supposed to be appointed this year (given that it wasn’t appointed last year when it was supposed to happen).

Continue reading HB 1527

SB 2548

SUBJECT: INCOME, FRANCHISE, Periodic Review of Exemptions, Deductions, and Credits, Surcharge on Beneficiaries of Tax Benefits

BILL NUMBER:  SB 2548

INTRODUCED BY: TOKUDA, BAKER, DELA CRUZ, ENGLISH, GALUTERIA, INOUYE, KEITH-AGARAN, KIDANI, NISHIHARA, SHIMABUKURO

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:  This bill would require the State Auditor to periodically review the myriad exemptions, deductions, and other tax benefits now provided under chapters 235 and 241.  The cost of the review would be recovered by a surcharge on those who now take the exemptions.  This type of review, however, should already be within the purview of the Tax Review Commission that is provided for in our constitution and is supposed to be appointed this year (given that it wasn’t appointed last year when it was supposed to happen).  In addition, the surcharge would be unfair to the recipients of income that is exempt by design of the tax system.

Continue reading SB 2548

SB 3075; HB 1610 (Identical)

SUBJECT: INCOME, FRANCHISE, Periodic Review of Exemptions, Deductions, and Credits, Surcharge on Beneficiaries of Tax Benefits

BILL NUMBER:  SB 3075; HB 1610 (Identical)

INTRODUCED BY: SB by L. THIELEN, Espero, Gabbard, Ihara, Kim, Nishihara; HB by THIELEN

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:  This bill would require an owner of a trailer bought out-of-state and subsequently brought into the State to provide proof of payment of the use tax with the application for registration unless otherwise exempt.  It applies to trailers the requirements now applied to other motor vehicles, and is reasonable.

Continue reading SB 3075; HB 1610 (Identical)